Appraise
9. References
9. References
Benos, D. J. et al. (2007) The ups and downs of peer review. Advances in Physiology Education, 31 (2), pp. 145–152
Cockcroft, P. D. (2007) Clinical reasoning and decision analysis. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 37 (3), pp. 499–520
Dean, R. (2013) How to read a paper and appraise the evidence. In Practice, 35 (5), pp. 282–285
EBVM Toolkit 4 - what type of study is it? [RCVS Knowledge] [online] Available from: https://knowledge.rcvs.org.uk/document-library/ebvm-toolkit-4-what-type-of-study-is-it/ [Accessed 19 November 2020]
Glanville, J. et al. (2015) A review of the systematic review process and its applicability for use in evaluating evidence for health claims on probiotic foods in the European Union. Nutrition Journal, 14:16
Glasziou, P. et al. (1998) Applying the results of trials and systematic reviews to individual patients. ACP Journal Club, 129 (3), pp. A15–6
Goodman, S. N. et al. (1994) Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine, 121 (1), pp. 11–21
Greenhalgh, T. (2019) How to read a paper: the basics of evidence-based medicine and healthcare. 6th Ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
Grindlay, D. J. et al. (2014) A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal Editors-in-Chief on reporting guidelines for publication of research. BMC Veterinary Research, 10:10. Available from: http://bmcvetres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1746-6148-10-10
Guidance on scientific writing [EQUATOR Network] [online] Available from: https://www.equator-network.org/library/guidance-on-scientific-writing/ [Accessed 19 November 2020]
Holmes M.A. and Ramey D.W. (2007) An introduction to evidence-based veterinary medicine. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice, 23 (2), pp.191-200
Holmes M. A. (2007) Evaluation of the evidence. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 37 (3), pp. 447–462
How to read a paper: a list of resources explaining how to read and interpret different kinds of papers [BMJ] [online] Available from: https://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-readers/publications/how-read-paper/ [Accessed 19 November 2020]
Kastelic, J. P. (2006) Critical evaluation of scientific articles and other sources of information: an introduction to evidence-based veterinary medicine. Theriogenology, 66 (3), pp. 534–542
Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine: levels of evidence (March 2009) [CEBM] [online] Available from: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/oxford-centre-for-evidence-based-medicine-levels-of-evidence-march-2009 [Accessed 19 November 2020]
Sargeant, J. M. et al. (2010) The REFLECT Statement: Reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials in livestock and food safety: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Food Protection, 73 (3), pp. 579–603
Simoneit, C., Heuwieser, W. and Arlt, S. (2011) Evidence-based medicine in bovine, equine and canine reproduction: quality of current literature. Theriogenology, 76 (6), pp. 1042–1050
Straus, S. E. and Sackett, D. L. (1998) Using research findings in clinical practice. BMJ, 317:339
Wareham, K.J., et al. (2017) Sponsorship bias and quality of randomised controlled trials in veterinary medicine. BMC Veterinary Research, 13, 234. Available from: https://bmcvetres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12917-017-1146-9